Share

REVIEW | Bakkies aren’t meant to be fuel efficient but the Ford Ranger XL bakkie says otherwise

accreditation
Share your Subscriber Article
You have 5 articles to share every month. Send this story to a friend!
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
loading...
Loading, please wait...
0:00
play article
Subscribers can listen to this article
Ford Ranger XL
Ford Ranger XL
Ford SA

The versatility of a bakkie just can't be emphasised enough. It can go virtually anywhere, in addition to hauling a load and not even breaking a sweat. I've had the Ford Ranger XL bakkie on an extended test, and other than being aptly capable, it also excels in an area usually reserved for smaller vehicles. 

Having bakkie and fuel-efficient in the same sentence is uncommon because the former usually have forced-induced, bigger displaced engines with bucketloads of torque to transport and pull heavy loads. Priced from R494 500, Ford's Ranger XL bakkie has a turbodiesel 2.0-litre four-cylinder engine that produces 125kW and 405Nm. The test unit we have is fitted with a six-speed manual transmission. 

While there is quite a lot of value for the price – which comes in cheaper than a Toyota Hilux – I wanted to test the limits of how frugal the 2.0-litre engine could be. Could I match or beat the automaker's average fuel consumption claim of 6.9-litres/100km?

Read this for free
South Africans need to be in the know if we want to create a prosperous future. News24 has kept the country informed for 25 years, and we're about to enter a new chapter of fearless journalism. Join our free subscription trial to unlock this story and a world of news aimed to inform, empower, and inspire.
Try our free 14-day trial
Already a subscriber? Sign in
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE